I actually discovered this was quite easy by by hovering the arrow over the timeline through the video and seeing the faces on the screen. There is a chance of missing someone who might pop in for a moment or two, but in that case its not such a big loss if they are not tagged. For those who participated in the whole call, or most of it, you see their faces while scrolling through. This does require that you know the names of the people and recognize their faces, since the names are not visible on the screen. So: this is a job for one of the regular participants who know all the people.
2:27 As I said before, the problem with the password is that it doesn’t accept certain special characters, but at least only alpha-numeric characters are fine.
6:52 That only means that the transmission of user input and responses from the server are encrypted, if all the pieces are set up as intended. It doesn’t provide any security for the server.
6:03 Erm…there’s a standard called XHTML, and all browsers are supposed to read/interpret that according to the standard, so it doesn’t matter what browser people use, and if it does matter because the browser isn’t standard-compliant, to hell with it, pick a decent one?
8:12 Please note that Sam Hahn was pioneering something called “cobrowsing” in the early days of the web and now completely forgotten, and that wasn’t even mentioned at all in the GCC conversations, to get near that level of Engelbartian-inspired capabilities. Today, products like Zoom try to sell their crappy versions of it as great “innovations”.
17:14 In most word-processor-style applications Ctrl + Click, is the short answer, otherwise at minimum via the menu for adjusting the underlaying URL to copy it from there manually.
15:38 That’s good to know, that it is an exact copy of the non-public Google Spreadsheet. The table on the site is something I probably could work with.
23:06 That’s the wrong one, it’s a pop-up over the cell below, you’re copying the link from row 155, but you want to copy the link from row 154. Imagine a viewer notices that post title and YouTube link don’t match, how would he engage to correct it?
36:06 I’m not aware, as WordPress started out as blogging software and therefore is usually chronological based on the date and order of publication (sure, you can change the publication date setting to get a different sequence, but that’s not the same).
6:41 +1 for HTTPS.
10:42 I repeat: that requires watching the whole thing, because people join and leave.
I actually discovered this was quite easy by by hovering the arrow over the timeline through the video and seeing the faces on the screen. There is a chance of missing someone who might pop in for a moment or two, but in that case its not such a big loss if they are not tagged. For those who participated in the whole call, or most of it, you see their faces while scrolling through. This does require that you know the names of the people and recognize their faces, since the names are not visible on the screen. So: this is a job for one of the regular participants who know all the people.
I replied to the similar comment under GCC Action Group meeting #1.
2:27 As I said before, the problem with the password is that it doesn’t accept certain special characters, but at least only alpha-numeric characters are fine.
6:52 That only means that the transmission of user input and responses from the server are encrypted, if all the pieces are set up as intended. It doesn’t provide any security for the server.
6:28 Josh, you gave my e-mail address publicly away in this video recording.
6:03 Erm…there’s a standard called XHTML, and all browsers are supposed to read/interpret that according to the standard, so it doesn’t matter what browser people use, and if it does matter because the browser isn’t standard-compliant, to hell with it, pick a decent one?
8:12 Please note that Sam Hahn was pioneering something called “cobrowsing” in the early days of the web and now completely forgotten, and that wasn’t even mentioned at all in the GCC conversations, to get near that level of Engelbartian-inspired capabilities. Today, products like Zoom try to sell their crappy versions of it as great “innovations”.
17:14 In most word-processor-style applications Ctrl + Click, is the short answer, otherwise at minimum via the menu for adjusting the underlaying URL to copy it from there manually.
15:38 That’s good to know, that it is an exact copy of the non-public Google Spreadsheet. The table on the site is something I probably could work with.
23:06 That’s the wrong one, it’s a pop-up over the cell below, you’re copying the link from row 155, but you want to copy the link from row 154. Imagine a viewer notices that post title and YouTube link don’t match, how would he engage to correct it?
36:06 I’m not aware, as WordPress started out as blogging software and therefore is usually chronological based on the date and order of publication (sure, you can change the publication date setting to get a different sequence, but that’s not the same).